More Malpractice

I'm not a doctor or a lawyer, but as a journalist, I checked the courthouse in a local medical malpractice case, and I can tell you that we are not talking about people who have minor physical injuries compensation or none at all. These are quickly eliminated by the judges. We speak out about this surgeon, people or things in the wrong body or the doctors who misdiagnosed a cut or serious illness, provided that the wrong drug or dose dangerous. Peoplepermanently disabled. Children die. The families are devastated. These are the people that are cleared by our court, and therefore are most affected by the reform of civil liability, and that is why we must not give up their rights to our real security measures that improve the quality of care and implemented reduce errors.

Kathy Miller

My previous post identified the excessive influence of malpractice on health care in America. One of the many gapsCare is the failure of Obama to face even, much less resolve, then, the major concern. physicians from malpractice spectra of infestation is raised, the change was about the treatment and recovery test is about.

However, I also agree with the statement by Kathy Mitchell, there are some incompetent, greedy drug, affected, arrogant, stupid and lazy doctors. Many doctors are good and bad days occasional lapses. The patients are injured and killed, and these problemswill not be released. Doctors should do better. Medical malpractice reform should go hand in hand with the quality of the health insurance reform.

What would a better system includes malpractice? Unlawful adversarial system should be replaced with a sort of no-fault system. The lawyers must be removed from the process, replaced by a medical education, impartial panel to make awards based on the degree of harm to the patient. Such systems arePlace and have had some success in New Zealand and Scandinavia. Of course, trial lawyers' lobby and its allies, both the White House and Congress, the fight with this death. Lawyers supporting the "rights" of patients and their financial interests, despite the fact that only 1 in 15 patients of medical errors to get compensation for all the current system.

Just to prove I'm not a lawyer bashing typical doctor, I am addressing medicalThe jurisdiction may still be problematic, there is an effective method to identify, discipline and retraining or even stop the doctors concerned, incompetent or criminal. State medical associations and hospital staff are powerless. The necessary complexity and intrusiveness of a fairly comprehensive system for monitoring the conduct of all care providers would be enormously expensive and Germany meet fierce resistance of the medical profession. Bureaucracyinvolved would be created by the rival Obama Care. (Perhaps the Bureau could generate would be occupied by all retired doctors just such a program.) Malpractice reform is essential for a realistic attempt to repair what the difficulties of the U.S. health care system. The allocation limits have been established to help doctors, but does not change the behavior of users. The almost insurmountable obstacles, the necessary reforms can doom any serious effort to improve our medical careSystem.

http://www.prescriptionforchange.org/about.html